Author Archives: Nigel Redmon

Wavetable signal to noise ratio

In our wavetable series, we discussed what size our wavetables needed to be in order to give us an appropriate number of harmonics. But since we interpolated between adjacent table entries, the table size also dictates the signal to noise … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Audio, Oscillators, Wavetable Oscillators | Leave a comment

Sampling theory, the best explanation you’ve ever heard—End notes

A few words before moving on to other topics… We’ve looked at why digital sample represent ideal impulses, and why any point between samples represents a value of zero. And, as a result, audio samples don’t represent the audio itself, … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Audio, Sampling Theory | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sampling theory, the best explanation you’ve ever heard—Part 3

We look at what Pulse Amplitude Modulation added to our analog source audio. What did PAM add? Earlier, we noted that the PAM signal represents the the source signal plus some additional high frequency content that we need to remove … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Audio, Sampling Theory | Tagged | 3 Comments

Sampling theory, the best explanation you’ve ever heard—Part 2

In this article, we explore the origins of sampling. Discrete time For many, discrete time and digital sampling are synonymous, because most people have little experience with discrete time analog. But perhaps you’ve used an old-style analog delay stompbox, with … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Audio, Sampling Theory | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sampling theory, the best explanation you’ve ever heard—Part 1

I’ll start by giving away secrets first: Individual digital samples are impulses. Not bandlimited impulses, ideal ones. We know what lies between samples—virtual zero samples. Audio samples don’t represent the source audio. They represent a modulated version of the audio. … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Audio, Sampling Theory | Tagged | 4 Comments

Sampling theory, the best explanation you’ve ever heard—Prologue

I’ve been working on a new video, with the goal of giving the best explanation of digital sampling you’ve ever heard. The catch is I started on it three years ago. I’m not that slow, it’s just that I’ve been … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Audio, Sampling Theory | Tagged | Leave a comment

Amp simulation oversampling

In tandem with our last article on Guitar amp simulation, this article gives a step by step view of the sampling and rate conversion processes, with a look at the frequency spectrum. From guitar to digital The first two charts embody the … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Audio, Effects, Guitar Amp Simulation, Sample Rate Conversion | 2 Comments

Guitar amp simulation

In this article, I’ll sketch a basic guitar amp simulator. For one, questions on the topic come up often, and also, it will be a good example of a typical use of working at a higher sample rate. The most … Continue reading

Posted in Aliasing, Digital Audio, Sample Rate Conversion | 3 Comments

About coefficient conventions

It’s been asked many times, so it’s worth an article explaining the conventions used on this site for transfer functions, and why they may differ from what you see elsewhere. People run into this most often with biquads: I use … Continue reading

Posted in Biquads, IIR Filters, Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Filter frequency response grapher

Here’s a tool that plots frequency response from filter coefficients. Hz linearlog 10log 2 Plot auto40 dB30 dB20 dB10 dB0 dB-10 dB-20 dB-30 dB-40 dB Max 60 dB80 dB100 dB120 dB140 dB160 dB180 dB Range a coefficients (zeros) b coefficients … Continue reading

Posted in Biquads, Filters, FIR Filters, IIR Filters, Uncategorized, Widgets | 12 Comments